When the former finance minister recently warned that reaching EU living standards would require us to “transition from walking barefoot on stones to taking flight,” his blunt metaphor drew sharp rebukes from officials but resonated deeply with business leaders. Suddenly, everyone grew alarmed by his prophetic calculation: at our current pace, we’d need nearly two centuries to catch up.

The message was clear—this race demands both marathon endurance and sprint speed, leaving no serious professional untouched.

The laws of physics apply equally to all bodies moving through fluids (gases and liquids), but not equitably. Air offers negligible resistance compared to water, which is 800 times denser—every movement through it requires twelve times more effort. Yet for generations, whenever our society faced important progress, we’ve essentially told half the population: “You there—swim! The rest of us will run.” This, in crude terms, reflects women’s current position in our business world and broader society.

Do women face twelve times more resistance than men? Quantifying it is difficult. Legally, we appear exemplary—the World Bank’s recent “Women, Business and the Law” report ranks Serbia among the top 20 global jurisdictions, nestled between Peru and Iceland. On paper, we’re world-class.

But reality diverges sharply. Additional World Bank data incorporating live interviews and financial indicators reveals a grimmer picture: the Western Balkans loses about 18% of GDP annually due to gender gaps in labor participation. Two-thirds stems from unequal workforce engagement, while the remainder reflects occupational segregation. Only two in five Serbian women are employed or seeking work, and those with jobs often find themselves in low-skill, underpaid sectors.

The most damning statistic? Thirty-seven percent of regional employers openly admit preferring male hires—a figure likely underreported given respondents’ candor during face-to-face surveys. So while we fight for every decimal of GDP growth, we’re effectively sidelining half our population from the race.

Over recent months, I’ve spent countless hours absorbing insights from Branka Rajičić, the first Serbian to attain partner status at PwC across Central and Eastern Europe. With quiet determination, she consistently validates her leadership—through financial results, team growth, and societal impact. Though she operates across multiple business fronts, Branka thinks deeply about legacy, with positive social influence being our recurring dialogue theme.

She’s not alone. This entire publication showcases formidable female leaders, entrepreneurs, and mentors reshaping environments through personal example. These are women confronting dismal statistics head-on, transforming lamentations into victory narratives. They guide hundreds—sometimes thousands—of colleagues and clients, unwittingly becoming beacons for others, especially younger women.

As they power forward, do fluid dynamics’ constraints still apply? Absolutely. Yet their calibrated approaches create expansive pathways for those following similar trajectories. Solidarity, while never their central focus, becomes the golden thread weaving through their companies’ successes and their communities’ progress.

These women shoulder disproportionate responsibility for change, generating an entirely new dynamic around them. Because true progress demands more than excellence—it requires the strength to alter the immutable.

At work, it’s easy to assume we know someone—their name, role, social circle, preferences. But people are complex, layered with identities: a brilliant colleague, an expert in their field, a devoted friend, partner, parent, perhaps a triathlete, a person of faith, a binge-watcher, or a self-taught linguist.

And what if they’re also gay? So what? It’s just one word describing a facet of their emotional life, another label on the list. Yet all these identities coexist in the same person, each surfacing in different moments, public or private.

But why should any of this matter at work? Shouldn’t professionalism mean leaving personal lives “within four walls”? The problem lies in the nature of identity: it can’t be neatly compartmentalized. We exist in relation to others. What does it mean to be an exceptional colleague if there are no colleagues? A great parent if there’s no child? If private lives with partners must stay hidden—if we can’t speak freely when needed—even a layperson can grasp the professional and psychological toll this takes.

This issue impacts business on multiple levels. Employers want employees to feel safe, comfortable, and accepted—not just because it’s humane, but because it boosts productivity. Research by Out Now estimates U.S. businesses could save $9 billion annually by fully implementing LGBTQ+ inclusive policies. Studies from the Williams Institute (commissioned by IBM and Credit Suisse) reveal employees who hide their sexual orientation due to fear suffer higher stress, anxiety, and related health issues.

Where people can thrive as their authentic selves, companies grow more effectively. In such environments, employees are 30% more likely to stay and grow with the organization—the ultimate goal of any HR strategy.

Some regional companies are already leading change. Dalmacijavino in Split recently shook the Balkans with a Facebook post featuring a gay couple lounging on a beach under the hashtag #BoliMePipi (“Pipi Doesn’t Care”). Cockta followed with a lesbian couple’s portrayal. Erste Bank Croatia boldly supported Zagreb Pride, declaring, “We believe all people are equal.” Their parent company has long understood LGBTQ+ inclusion’s value for business. In Bosnia, a Headhunter study of 61 companies found only a handful—like DM, the British Council, and Represent Communications—actively safeguarding LGBTQ+ dignity in hiring and workplace culture.

Serbian brands, however, still hesitate to take decisive steps. The “four walls” concept is tempting when avoiding discomfort or controversy. But true prosperity—especially in crisis—requires expanding those walls. For now, they enclose homes, safe spaces with friends, and a few brave companies. It’s time to tear them down entirely, so everyone can contribute fully—to their own success, their company’s, and their country’s.

Pride parades matter, but what we truly need is a parade of success—for every person, in every facet of who they are.